{"id":29265,"date":"2026-08-31T07:00:03","date_gmt":"2026-08-31T07:00:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/bilnex.io\/lv\/peppol-validesana-nosutisana\/"},"modified":"2026-08-31T07:00:03","modified_gmt":"2026-08-31T07:00:03","slug":"peppol-validesana-nosutisana","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/bilnex.io\/en\/peppol-validesana-nosutisana\/","title":{"rendered":"Peppol Tools: Validation or Uncertified Shipping?"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
\n

Peppol r\u0113\u0137ina valid\u0113\u0161ana un t\u0101 nos\u016bt\u012b\u0161ana ir divas piln\u012bgi at\u0161\u0137ir\u012bgas darb\u012bbas, ko gr\u0101matve\u017ei un programmat\u016bras komandas bie\u017ei sajauc vien\u0101 sol\u012b. Valid\u0113\u0161ana noz\u012bm\u0113 r\u0113\u0137ina XML faila, jeb datora nolas\u0101ma datu faila, p\u0101rbaudi pret Eiropas e-r\u0113\u0137inu standarta EN 16931 pras\u012bb\u0101m. T\u0101 par\u0101da, vai strukt\u016bra un lauki ir k\u0101rt\u012bb\u0101, bet r\u0113\u0137inu nekur t\u0101l\u0101k nevirza. Nos\u016bt\u012b\u0161ana noz\u012bm\u0113 r\u0113\u0137ina faktisku pieg\u0101di adres\u0101tam Peppol t\u012bkl\u0101, par ko atbild Peppol-sertific\u0113ts piek\u013cuves punkts (Access Point). Manu\u0101lai p\u0101rbaudei noder bezmaksas Eiropas Komisijas e-r\u0113\u0137inu valid\u0113\u0161anas r\u012bks<\/a>, kas p\u0101rbauda r\u0113\u0137inu UBL vai CII form\u0101t\u0101. Faktiskai nos\u016bt\u012b\u0161anai tom\u0113r nepiecie\u0161ams savienojums ar Peppol-sertific\u0113tu pakalpojumu sniedz\u0113ju, kura piek\u013cuves punkts izejo\u0161o zi\u0146ojumu valid\u0113 v\u0113lreiz un atrod adres\u0101tu<\/a> pirms t\u0101l\u0101knodo\u0161anas.<\/p>\n

K\u0101p\u0113c parasti nepiecie\u0161ami divi r\u012bki, nevis viens?<\/h2>\n

\u0160\u012b neskaidr\u012bba rodas, jo abas darb\u012bbas izmanto vienu un to pa\u0161u v\u0101rdu \u2013 \u201evalid\u0113\u0161ana\u201d. Bezmaksas validators atbild uz jaut\u0101jumu \u201evai fails ir korekts?\u201d. Piek\u013cuves punkts atbild uz jaut\u0101jumu \u201ekur un k\u0101 \u0161is fails faktiski non\u0101k adres\u0101t\u0101?\u201d. Peppol Interoperability Framework<\/a> \u0161o modeli apraksta k\u0101 \u010detru st\u016bru modeli (4 st\u016bru modelis): p\u0101rdev\u0113js nos\u016bta r\u0113\u0137inu savam piek\u013cuves punktam, tas atrod pirc\u0113ja piek\u013cuves punktu, izmantojot centraliz\u0113tu adres\u0101tu re\u0123istru, un p\u0101rs\u016bta r\u0113\u0137inu t\u0101l\u0101k dro\u0161i. Katram nos\u016bto\u0161ajam piek\u013cuves punktam ir pien\u0101kums pirms nos\u016bt\u012b\u0161anas p\u0101rbaud\u012bt izejo\u0161o zi\u0146ojumu pret Peppol BIS noteikumiem. \u0160\u012b p\u0101rbaude ir nos\u016bt\u012b\u0161anas procesa da\u013ca, nevis atsevi\u0161\u0137s pakalpojums, ko pas\u016bt\u0101t manu\u0101li. Bezmaksas validators pats nekur zi\u0146ojumu nep\u0101rs\u016bta un nep\u0101rbauda, vai adres\u0101ts past\u0101v. T\u0101 ir kvalit\u0101tes kontrole pirms nos\u016bt\u012b\u0161anas, nevis pieg\u0101des pakalpojums \u2013 to skaidri par\u0101da r\u012bka apraksts<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Lab\u0101k\u0101s valid\u0113\u0161anas iesp\u0113jas p\u0113c lieto\u0161anas gad\u012bjumiem<\/h2>\n

Manu\u0101lai p\u0101rbaudei un izstr\u0101d\u0101t\u0101jiem<\/h3>\n

Ja r\u0113\u0137inu p\u0101rbaud\u0101t manu\u0101li pirms nos\u016bt\u012b\u0161anas, praktisk\u0101kais risin\u0101jums ir Eiropas Komisijas eInvoice Validator<\/a> \u2013 tas ir bezmaksas un pieejams caur t\u012bmek\u013ca saskarni, REST saskarni vai SOAP saskarni. Izstr\u0101d\u0101t\u0101jiem, kas valid\u0113\u0161anu ieb\u016bv\u0113 tie\u0161i programmat\u016br\u0101, nepiecie\u0161ami ofici\u0101lie Peppol Schematron artefakti, jeb noteikumu faili, kas p\u0101rbauda katra BT koda (Business Term, biznesa termins) atbilst\u012bbu standartam, un izmai\u0146u v\u0113sture<\/a> par\u0101da, kad \u0161ie noteikumi main\u0101s.<\/p>\n

Produkcijas vid\u0113, kur r\u0113\u0137ini faktiski tiek nos\u016bt\u012bti<\/h3>\n

Produkcijas vid\u0113, kur r\u0113\u0137ini tiek faktiski nos\u016bt\u012bti, tre\u0161o, oblig\u0101to p\u0101rbaudi veic j\u016bsu piek\u013cuves punkts: tas autom\u0101tiski valid\u0113 izejo\u0161o zi\u0146ojumu<\/a>, pirms tas visp\u0101r non\u0101k t\u012bkl\u0101. \u0160o tre\u0161o p\u0101rbaudi jums nav j\u0101pas\u016bta atsevi\u0161\u0137i, bet ir v\u0113rts zin\u0101t, ka t\u0101 notiek. Cit\u0101di rodas mald\u012bgs priek\u0161stats, ka manu\u0101la valid\u0113\u0161ana un faktisk\u0101 nos\u016bt\u012b\u0161ana ir viens un tas pats process.<\/p>\n

Ko p\u0101rbaud\u012bt Peppol r\u0113\u0137in\u0101 pirms nos\u016bt\u012b\u0161anas?<\/h2>\n

Pirms nos\u016bt\u012b\u0161anas noder\u0113s vienk\u0101r\u0161s p\u0101rbaudes saraksts:<\/p>\n