{"id":29376,"date":"2026-09-13T11:00:01","date_gmt":"2026-09-13T11:00:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/bilnex.io\/en\/peppol-mls-status-explained\/"},"modified":"2026-09-13T11:00:01","modified_gmt":"2026-09-13T11:00:01","slug":"status-mls-peppol-wyjasniony","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/bilnex.io\/pl\/status-mls-peppol-wyjasniony\/","title":{"rendered":"Czym jest Peppol MLS i co tak naprawd\u0119 udowadnia?"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
\n

Peppol MLS (short for Message Level Status) is a technical status message that your buyer’s service provider (called C3 in Peppol’s four-corner model, where two providers sit between you and your trading partner) sends back to the provider that sent your e-invoice (C2), reporting exactly what happened to that document. It isn’t a business reply from the buyer. Under Peppol’s MLS specification v1.1.0<\/a>, MLS exists so two providers can check each other’s reliability, not so the buyer can confirm whether they actually received, approved or paid the invoice. Global rollout of MLS began on 1 July 2026<\/a>, but providers won’t be required to actively send MLS messages until 31 March 2027<\/a>. Until that date, seeing no positive status at all is completely normal; it’s not a sign anything’s wrong.<\/p>\n

Does AP mean the buyer received and approved the invoice?<\/h2>\n

No. AP means your buyer’s provider holds verifiable proof that the document reached the final recipient (C4) for processing. That proof might be, say, an acknowledgement returned through a software API. Per the specification<\/a>, AP can’t be used when the document is delivered to C4 by email; in that case the only positive status available is AB. So AP is solid technical evidence that the invoice reached the doorstep of the buyer’s system, but it isn’t evidence that a bookkeeper actually looked at it, let alone started paying it.<\/p>\n

What do RE, AP and AB actually mean?<\/h2>\n

RE means the document never reached C4’s processing at all. The most common causes<\/a> are a schema or business-rule error, a virus, a broken attachment, a file that’s too large, or a persistent delivery failure. AP means verifiable confirmation that the document reached C4. AB means C3 forwarded the document toward C4 but can’t confirm it actually arrived. That’s what happens with email delivery, file transfer, or a local drop folder the recipient only reads from later. If C3 hits a temporary glitch, it uses AB and keeps trying; that’s not the same as a permanent RE rejection.<\/p>\n

Why does a correctly sent invoice sometimes show no positive status?<\/h2>\n

The most common reason isn’t a failure. It’s a default setting. The specification sets<\/a> the default mode to FAILURE_ONLY: unless your outgoing envelope carries the flag MLS_TYPE=ALWAYS_SEND, your buyer’s provider will only send back a negative RE response if something goes wrong; it won’t bother sending a positive AP or AB at all. So a missing status doesn’t mean the invoice vanished. It usually just means nobody asked for positive confirmation in the first place.<\/p>\n

What to ask your e-invoicing provider before 2027<\/h2>\n

Providers need production-ready receiving capability by 28 February 2027<\/a>, ahead of the 31 March 2027<\/a> deadline when active sending becomes mandatory. Ask your software or operator three things: whether they already support receiving MLS, whether AP and AB statuses will actually show up in your interface, and whether, for smaller documents, they meet the speed set out in Peppol’s Network Policy<\/a>, which requires 99.5% of MLS messages to arrive within 20\u201325 minutes. And keep one thing straight: MLS doesn’t replace the agreement with your trading partner on invoice format and acceptance terms required under Estonia’s Accounting Act<\/a>. Real approval still comes from the buyer, never from the Peppol network itself.<\/p>\n

FAQ<\/h2>\n

Kas AP t\u00e4hendab, et ostja arve k\u00e4tte sai ja heaks kiitis?<\/h3>\n

Ei. AP on tehniline kinnitus, et dokument j\u00f5udis l\u00f5ppvastuv\u00f5tja (C4) t\u00f6\u00f6tlemisse, mitte ostja \u00e4riline heakskiit. AP ei t\u00f5enda, et raamatupidaja arvet n\u00e4gi v\u00f5i maksma hakkas.<\/p>\n

Mida t\u00e4hendavad Peppol MLS staatused RE, AP ja AB?<\/h3>\n

RE \u2013 dokument ei j\u00f5udnud C4 t\u00f6\u00f6tlemisse (skeemiviga, viirus, katkine manus, liiga suur fail). AP \u2013 kontrollitav kinnitus, et dokument j\u00f5udis C4-ni. AB \u2013 C3 saatis dokumendi edasi, kuid ei saa kinnitada kohalej\u00f5udmist (nt e-posti teel).<\/p>\n

Miks \u00f5igesti saadetud arvel positiivne staatus puudub?<\/h3>\n

Levinuim p\u00f5hjus on vaikeseade FAILURE_ONLY \u2013 kui \u00fcmbrikus pole m\u00e4rget MLS_TYPE=ALWAYS_SEND, saadab teenusepakkuja tagasi ainult negatiivse RE, mitte positiivset AP v\u00f5i AB. Positiivset kinnitust pole keegi k\u00fcsinud.<\/p>\n

Millal muutub Peppol MLS teenusepakkujatele kohustuslikuks?<\/h3>\n

Teenusepakkujal peab vastuv\u00f5tuv\u00f5imekus tootmises olema hiljemalt 28. veebruaril 2027. Aktiivne MLS-i saatmine muutub kohustuslikuks 31. m\u00e4rtsil 2027.<\/p>\n